Saturday, 11.22.2008, 07:13am (GMT-7)
  Home
  FAQ
  RSS
  Links
  Site Map
  Contact
 
US Health department seeks AAPI's help in Afghanistan ; 'Developing countries victims, not cause' ; G-20 meet underscores gravity of economic crisis ; Sri Chinmoy statue at Oslo's Waterfront Centre ; US wants UN framework for prosecution of pirates
::| Keyword:       [Advance Search]
 
NAVIGATION  
  Bollywood
  Community Post
  Health Science
  Horoscope
  Immigration
  India
  Life Style
  Perspective
  Philosophy
  Real Estate
  Sports
  TechBiz
  Travel
  US News
  ::| Poll
Is their bias in Anand Jon trial?
Yes
No
Can't Say
 
  ::| Newsletter
Your Name:
Your Email:
 
 
 
India
 
Speaker rejects demand for voting on N-deal
Sunday, 08.19.2007, 11:02pm (GMT-7)

NEW DELHI: Making it clear that Parliament has "no competence" to decide on operation-alisation of Indo-US nuclear agreement, Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee rejected opposition demand for re-negotiation of the deal and voting on it in the House.

The House will, however, discuss the nuclear deal under a rule that does not entail voting, he said. "There has been no occasion where any treaty or agreement was ever discussed under Rule 184," Chatterjee observed, while rejecting the motions moved by Leader of Opposition L K Advani, BJP member Santosh Gangwar and Samajwadi Party's Ram Gopal Yadav for debate under the rule which entails voting.

He said the government has the "sovereign" power and "unrestricted" right to enter into any treaty or agreement like the Indo-US nuclear deal with other countries and it is well-established that "there is no requirement to obtain ratification from Parliament".

The motions "require the government to re-negotiate" the 123 nuclear agreement, he pointed out. By asking the government to re-negotiate the pact, the motions "in effect seek to disapprove (of) the agreement entered into and require the government not to give effect to the agreement in its present form and contents, which the House has no competence to do," the Speaker said.

"It will clearly amount to the House rejecting the agreement in its present form," he added. Under the Constitution and in the absence of appropriate laws made by Parliament, "the right of the Central government to enter into treaties and agreements with foreign countries in its sovereign power, is unrestricted and any such treaty or agreement becomes effective without any intervention by Parliament," Chatterjee said.

PTI

    Print        Tell friend        Top


Other Articles:
Fernandes condemned for remarks against PM (08.19.2007)
BJP says it wants govt to remain and make blunders (08.19.2007)
Terrorists in Kashmir on the run: Army Chief (08.19.2007)
Sonia backs PM on N-deal with US; Left adamant (08.16.2007)
Home Ministry rules out NRI benefits to PIOs (08.16.2007)
MLAs lead attack on Taslima (08.12.2007)
Left warns Govt on nuclear deal (08.12.2007)
SC declines urgent hearing to Sanjay Dutt (08.12.2007)
Rich tributes paid to Chandrashekhar (08.12.2007)
Broadcasters demand content code for internet TV (08.12.2007)



 
  ::| Events
November 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
 
::| Hot News
Indian Navy sinks pirate ship in Gulf battle
ElBaradei chosen for Indira Gandhi Peace Prize
Threat to Ganga, Brahmaputra waters
Yoga guru Ramdev distances himself from BJP
Financial meltdown not to affect Indo-US deal
Obama's win extraordinary journey, says PM
13 serial blasts kill 80 in Assam
World hails India's moon feat
400 delegates attend Mini PBD in Singapore
Bihari gunman killed in Mumbai shoot-out

Contact us:
(510) 429 - 2110
[Top Page]