BOISE, Idaho: A federal judge said that a lawsuit between two Idaho hospitals and the Federal Trade Commission comes down to whether St. Luke’s Health System really needs to buy more physician practices to bring about promised long-term cost savings and improved care or whether the company has gone too far to curb competition.
U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill posed that question and others to attorneys involved in the case on the last day of a monthlong trial, The Idaho Statesman reported.
The lawsuit stems from St. Luke’s buyout of Nampa-based Saltzer Medical Group. The FTC and Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center contend the buyout was an illegal market grab and gives St. Luke’s an unfair advantage. But St. Luke’s contends the acquisition will allow it to improve patient care and launch new medical plans designed to help low-income and uninsured patients.
Winmill called the case one of the most difficult he’d had to preside over because the stakes are high for the businesses and the communities they serve. He said he’ll try to have a ruling issued within the next few weeks.
David Ettinger, an attorney representing Saint Alphonsus, sought to pierce a major St. Luke’s argument – that it will take years for the positive outcomes of the Saltzer deal to surface. He called that a “Wimpy” defense, a reference to the Popeye character who says, “I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.”
Jack Bierig, a lawyer for St. Luke’s, countered that after reviewing terabytes of documents and data, none of the plaintiffs found evidence that St. Luke’s bought Saltzer so it could control the Canyon County health care market.-AP
Thank You For Your Vote!
Sorry You have Already Voted!
